[location-weather id="7878"]

Wired: 200 Researchers, 5 Hypotheses, No Consistent Answers

7 December, 2019 | 
Pureprofile 

Originally published: Wired, 06 December 2019

Just how much wisdom is there in the scientific crowd?
If science is an objective means of seeking truth, it’s also one that requires human judgements. Let’s say you’re a psychologist with a hypothesis: People understand that they may be biased in unconscious ways against stigmatized groups; they will admit this if you ask them. That might seem like a pretty straightforward idea—one that’s either true or not. But the best way to test it isn’t necessarily obvious.  First, what do you mean by negative stereotypes? Which stigmatized groups are you talking about? How would you measure the extent to which people are aware of their implicit attitudes, and how would you gauge their willingness to disclose them?
Read the full article >

Continue Exploring

More data, insights and media from the experts

Are we plugged into Electric Vehicles?
Infographic

Are we plugged into Electric Vehicles?

Tracking sentiment towards EVs in Australia & New Zealand Our latest electric vehicle study reveals existing Aussie & Kiwi EV owners would purchase an EV again in the future, but

Group of young business people analyzing data Unveiling the power of brand health studies
Blog

Unveiling the power of brand health studies

By Riko Rahman, Client Solutions Director – Data & Insights, APAC – Indonesia What is a brand health study? A brand health study is a comprehensive analysis that assesses the

SIGN UP NOW

Stay up to date with our latest news, insights and trends reports

SIGN UP NOW

Stay up to date with our latest news, insights and trends reports