magnifying glass icon

Wired: 200 Researchers, 5 Hypotheses, No Consistent Answers

Originally published: Wired, 06 December 2019

Just how much wisdom is there in the scientific crowd?
If science is an objective means of seeking truth, it’s also one that requires human judgements. Let’s say you’re a psychologist with a hypothesis: People understand that they may be biased in unconscious ways against stigmatized groups; they will admit this if you ask them. That might seem like a pretty straightforward idea—one that’s either true or not. But the best way to test it isn’t necessarily obvious.  First, what do you mean by negative stereotypes? Which stigmatized groups are you talking about? How would you measure the extent to which people are aware of their implicit attitudes, and how would you gauge their willingness to disclose them?
Read the full article >

Continue Exploring

More data, insights and media from the experts

A man looking stressed while sitting at a laptop, resting his head on his hand as he stares at the screen.
In the news

Shoppers ditch Australian brands over poor site search

Originally published: ITBrief, 04 March 2026 Elastic has published consumer research suggesting poor on-site search is driving Australian online shoppers away from brands. Nearly three-quarters of respondents said they have

SIGN UP NOW

Stay up to date with our latest news, insights and trends reports

SIGN UP NOW

Stay up to date with our latest news, insights and trends reports

Pureprofile logo
This website uses cookies

We use cookies on our site to help give you a better experience. By continuing you consent to us using this data. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy.